主管:中华人民共和国应急管理部
主办:应急管理部天津消防研究所
ISSN 1009-0029  CN 12-1311/TU

消防科学与技术 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 1613-1617.

• • 上一篇    

火场易燃液体检验鉴定国内外标准对比研究

钱佩雯1,金 静2,李秋璠梓1,殷 果1   

  1. (1.中国人民警察大学 研究生院,河北 廊坊 065000; 2.中国人民警察大学 侦查学院,河北 廊坊065000)
  • 出版日期:2022-11-15 发布日期:2022-11-15
  • 作者简介:钱佩雯(1998- ),女,中国人民警察大学研究生二队硕士研究生,主要从事火场易燃液体检验鉴定的研究,河北省廊坊市安次区西昌路220号,065000。
  • 基金资助:
    公安部技术研究计划(2020JSYJC24)

Contrastive analysis of ignitable liquid residuesidentification at fire site in China and othercountries' criterions

Qian Peiwen1, Jin Jing2, Li Qiufanzi2, Yin Guo2   

  1. (1. School of Graduate, China People's Police University, Hebei Langfang 065000, China; 2. School of Criminal Investigation, China People's Police University, Hebei Langfang 065000, China)
  • Online:2022-11-15 Published:2022-11-15

摘要: 对于使用易燃液体实施的放火,易燃液体的检验鉴定是认定火灾性质的关键,而相关物证检验鉴定标准的建设具有重要意义。为进一步完善我国相关标准建设,在对美国材料试验协会、澳大利亚标准委员会和我国易燃液体检验鉴定标准体系整体介绍的基础上,着重对中外4个标准中对易燃液体的种属分类、易燃液体残留物物证保存条件、易燃液体特征组分识别、干扰因素分析以及鉴定报告内容5部分进行了横向比较。结果表明,国内外易燃液体检验鉴定标准在具体鉴定程序上有所差异,国外标准在物证检材的保存、干扰因素的分析及鉴定报告的撰写等方面对我国标准的修订具有一定的借鉴性,研究结果可为我国火场易燃液体检验鉴定标准的完善提供重要参考和指导。

关键词: 放火, 物证鉴定, 火场燃烧残留物, 易燃液体检验鉴定, 易燃液体鉴定标准

Abstract: For arson cases involved with ignitable liquids, the identifications of ignitable liquid residues are of vital importance in determining the nature of the fire cases, hence the construction of relevant physical evidence identification standards is of great significance. Based on the overall introduction of the American Materials Testing Association, the Australian Standards Committee and China's ignitable liquid identification standard system, the study herein focused on five aspects in standards of China and other countries, including the classification of ignitable liquids, environmental conditions for preserving ignitable liquid residues, identifications of characteristic compounds in ignitable liquids, interfering factors and appraisal reports and made horizontal comparisons. The results showed that the identification standards for ignitable liquids in China and other countries varied when it comes to the specific identification procedures. Foreign standards have a certain reference for the revision of China's standards in terms of the preservation of material evidence, the analysis of interfering factors and the composition of appraisal reports, which was proved to be instructive for the improvement of the ignitable liquid identification criteria in China.

Key words: arson, physical evidence identification, fire debris, identification of ignitable liquid, standards of ignitable liquid residues