主管:中华人民共和国应急管理部
主办:应急管理部天津消防研究所
ISSN 1009-0029  CN 12-1311/TU

消防科学与技术 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (11): 1549-1554.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

不同驱动压力下灭火剂对云南松木垛的灭火效能研究

黄淙葆, 代张音, 陈有成, 蒙文富   

  1. (贵州大学 矿业学院,贵州 贵阳 550025)
  • 出版日期:2023-11-15 发布日期:2023-11-15
  • 作者简介:黄淙葆(1999- ),男,广西贵港人,贵州大学硕士研究生,主要从事森林火灾方面的研究,贵州省贵阳市花溪区甲秀南路,550025。
  • 基金资助:
    贵州省科技计划项目(黔科合支撑[2022]一般250)

Extinguishing efficiency of fire agent on Yunnan pine crib under different driving pressure

Huang Congbao, Dai Zhangyin, Chen Youcheng, Meng Wenfu   

  1. (Mining College, Guizhou University, Guizhou Guiyang 550025, China)
  • Online:2023-11-15 Published:2023-11-15

摘要: 为进一步提升我国森林防灭火技术水平,降低森林火灾造成的损失与危害,本文针对西南林火不同驱动压力下灭火剂的灭火效能,选取西南地区常见易燃树种云南松作为燃烧材料,搭建木垛灭火试验平台,通过模拟西南林区木材燃烧状态,开展3种驱动压力(0.45、0.55、0.65 MPa)条件对水凝胶灭火剂与A类泡沫灭火剂的灭火效能影响试验研究,基于灭火时间、耗量、降温速率、降低热辐射通量效果等参数进行对比分析。结果表明:驱动压力逐渐增大时,木垛灭火时间逐渐缩短,流速增加,灭火剂耗量逐渐减少;当驱动压力从0.45 MPa分别增加至0.55 MPa和0.65 MPa时,A类泡沫灭火剂的降温速率增幅约6%和54%,水凝胶灭火剂降温速率增幅约54%和90%;随着驱动压力增加,灭火剂降低热辐射通量速率增大;相同驱动压力下,A类泡沫灭火剂对燃烧木垛冷却深度不足,0.45 MPa驱动压力下无法有效抑制木垛火焰,水凝胶灭火剂可快速扑灭明火,有效抑制阴燃木垛复燃。

关键词: 灭火剂, 森林火灾, 云南松木垛, 驱动压力, 灭火效能, 热辐射通量

Abstract: In order to further improve the technology level of forest fire prevention and reduce the loss and damage caused by forest fires, Yunnan pine, a common flammable species in southwest China, was selected as the burning material to build a fire extinguishing agent spraying wood stack fire test platform. The experimental study on the influence of three driving pressures (0.45、0.55、0.65 MPa) on the fire extinguishing efficiency of hydrogel extinguishing agent and Class A foam extinguishing agent was carried out, and comparative analysis was made based on the parameters of fire extinguishing time, consumption, cooling rate and effect of reducing heat radiation flux. The results show that when the driving pressure increases gradually, the fire extinguishing time decreases gradually, the flow rate increases, and the extinguishing agent consumption decreases gradually. When the driving pressure increases from 0.45 MPa to 0.55 MPa and 0.65 MPa respectively, the cooling rate of Class A foam agent increases by about 6% and 54%, and that of hydrogel agent increases by about 54% and 90%. With the increase of driving pressure, the decreasing heat radiation flux rate of extinguishing agent increases. Under the same driving pressure, the cooling depth of class A foam extinguishing agent is insufficient for burning wood battlements, and the fire of wood battlements cannot be effectively suppressed under the driving pressure of 0.45 MPa, while the hydrogel extinguishing agent can quickly extinguish open fire and effectively inhibit the reignition of smoldering wood.

Key words: fire agent, forest fires, Yunnan pine crib, driving pressure, fire extinguishing efficiency, thermal radiation flux