主管:中华人民共和国应急管理部
主办:应急管理部天津消防研究所
ISSN 1009-0029  CN 12-1311/TU

消防科学与技术 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5): 629-636.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

电缆隧道内防火隔板隔热性能劣化失效周期评估方法

普子恒1, 方取1, 蔡静2, 郭卫2   

  1. (1.三峡大学 电气与新能源学院,湖北 宜昌 443002; 2.国网北京市电力公司电力科学研究院,北京 100075)
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-15 修回日期:2024-09-14 出版日期:2025-05-15 发布日期:2025-05-15
  • 作者简介:普子恒,三峡大学电气与新能源学院副教授,博士,研究方向为高压电气设备绝缘试验技术、输电线路智能运维,湖北省宜昌市西陵区大学路8号,443002,pzhdq@ctgu.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(51607103)

Failure period evaluation method for thermal insulation performance degradation of fire barrier in cable tunnel

Pu Ziheng1, Fang Qu1, Cai Jing2, Guo Wei2   

  1. (1. College of Electrical Engineering & New Energy, China Three Gorges University, Yichang Hubei 443002, China; 2. State Grid Beijing Electric Power Research Institute, Beijing 100075, China)
  • Received:2024-07-15 Revised:2024-09-14 Online:2025-05-15 Published:2025-05-15

摘要: 电缆隧道内在运有机模压防火隔板的常规性能测试方法难以反映老化后的隔热性能,无法判断劣化失效情况。为此,本文提出了一种针对老化后防火隔板隔热性能的量化方法。首先对防火隔板进行湿热老化处理,然后进行等效燃烧试验,获得老化后防火隔板的高温耐受时间,并结合灭火装置动作时间统计规律得到基于防火隔板隔热性能的失效周期。进一步利用剩余强度模型及不同老化周期下防火隔板的力学性能测试数据,计算出基于力学性能的防火隔板失效周期。最后综合对比分析基于隔热性能和力学性能的使用寿命,确定防火隔板的失效周期。研究结果表明:基于冲击强度和弯曲强度的防火隔板失效周期分别约为45.19 年与15.07 年。在220 kV及110 kV高压电缆隧道中的防火隔板,其寿命由隔板的隔热性能来确定,失效周期分别为10.1 年和11.4 年;35 kV电缆隧道的防火隔板考虑隔热性能的使用寿命为17.19 年,因此其寿命由隔板的力学性能来确定,失效周期大约为15.07 年。

关键词: 防火隔板, 失效周期评估, 湿热老化, 力学性能, 隔热性能

Abstract: The conventional performance test method of organic molded fire barrier in cable tunnel is difficult to reflect the heat insulation performance after aging, and it is impossible to judge the deterioration failure. Therefore, this paper proposes a quantitative method for the thermal insulation performance of the fire barrier after aging. Firstly, the fire barrier is subjected to hygrothermal aging treatment, and then the equivalent combustion test is carried out to obtain the high temperature tolerance time of the aged fire barrier. Combined with the statistical law of the action time of the fire extinguishing appliance, the failure cycle based on the thermal insulation performance of the fire barrier is obtained. Furthermore, the residual strength model and the mechanical properties test data of the fire barrier under different aging cycles are used to calculate the failure cycle of the fire barrier based on the mechanical properties. Finally, based on the comprehensive comparative analysis of the service life of thermal insulation performance and mechanical properties, the failure period of the fire barrier is determined. The results show that the failure periods based on the impact strength and bending strength of the fire barrier are about 45.19 years and 15.07 years, respectively. The life of the fire barrier in the 220 kV and 110 kV high voltage cable tunnels is determined by the thermal insulation performance of the barrier, and the failure periods are 10.1 years and 11.4 years, respectively. The service life of the fire barrier of 35 kV cable tunnel is 17.19 years considering the thermal insulation performance, so its life is determined by the mechanical properties of the barrier, and the failure period is about 15.07 years.

Key words: fire barrier, failure cycle assessment, damp heat aging, mechanical properties, thermal insulation performance