Development and review of building fire risk assessment methods

Fire Science and Technology ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 1174-1177.

Previous Articles Next Articles

Development and review of building fire risk assessment methods

HUANG Xiao-jia1,2, WANG Yi2, XIE Shui-bo2, ZHANG Lei2

1. China IPPR International Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing 100089, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, University of South China, Hunan Hengyang 421001, China

Online:2021-08-15 Published:2021-08-15

Abstract

Abstract:

The development process of semi-quantitative analysis and quantitative analysis of building fire risk assessment since 1970s is summarized. The common analysis methods of semi quantitative evaluation, such as Delphi method, analytic hierarchy process, fuzzy evaluation, grey correlation analysis and entropy weight method were introduced briefly. Several common analysis methods in quantitative risk assessment and their application in fire risk analysis were introduced, which includes statistical analysis of fire data, event tree and fault tree, Monte Carlo simulation and Bayesian network.

Key words: building fire, risk analysis, semi-quantitative analysis, quantitative analysis

HUANG Xiao-jia, WANG Yi, XIE Shui-bo, ZHANG Lei.

Development and review of building fire risk assessment methods [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2021, 40(8): 1174-1177.

[1]	Chen Wentao, Gao Xing, Sun Chao, Wang Wenhe, Yang Zhiquan, Liu Chaolin. Research on causal factors of gas leakage accidents based on LDA-DEMATEL-ISM [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2026, 45(5): 1-8.
[2]	Xia Yunlong, Xia Dengyou, Chen Changlin, Xia Zhenglin. Multi-layer networks model and risk analysis of oil tank area fire accidents [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2025, 44(8): 1056-1061.
[3]	Chen Wentao, Zhang Xinglu, Yang Zhiquan. Application of BT-BN in fire dynamic risk analysis of large commercial complex [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2025, 44(4): 491-496.
[4]	Feng Qirui, Song Zhiqiang, Xiao Junshi, Wang Huaifeng, Wang Yanpeng, Yu Zengyi, Wu Jiahao, Feng Yao. Quantitative analysis and research on fires in newly-built offshore drilling and production platforms [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2025, 44(4): 497-503.
[5]	Chen Huiyu, Xia Dengyou, Zang Na, Chen Changlin. Risk analysis of oil tank fire accident chain based on complex network [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2024, 43(11): 1495-1499.
[6]	Zhang Yi, Zhang Wei. Quantitative study on the risk of pyrolysis gas released by lithium battery based on Raman spectroscopy [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2024, 43(10): 1355-1360.
[7]	WANG Li-zhong, YU Hong-xia, YUAN Fei, DUAN Yi, SHI Jian-feng. Fire safety design of underground pedestrian corridor [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2022, 41(8): 1061-1065.
[8]	SHEN Rui, QIN Li-peng, CHEN Hai-tao. Risk analysis and countermeasure research in vehicle accident rescue [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2022, 41(6): 847-850.
[9]	WANG Fei. Discussion on fire safety technology of new energy vehicle battery swap station [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2022, 41(5): 710-715.
[10]	PENG Yu-jie, DONG Shao-hua, XIE Shu-yi, DUAN Yu-hang. Risk analysis of tank farm based on EWM-AHP and fuzzy Bayesian network [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2022, 41(5): 634-638.
[11]	. Quantitative analysis of the metallographic of Cu+Cu2O eutectic in copper wire short circuit molten beads [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2022, 41(2): 279-281.
[12]	LI Wei-dong, ZHOU De-hong, XIAO Zhen-hang, ZHANG Ming. Risk analysis of LNG storage tank based on Bow-tie normal cloud model [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2021, 40(9): 1322-1326.
[13]	DING Shi-yi, YANG Han, WANG Jian. Raman spectral identification technology of the burned globules [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2021, 40(6): 929-932.
[14]	WANG Hui-ying, WU Qi-ming, WANG Zhao-qiang. Fire cause analysis of fairs based on MCFM [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2021, 40(5): 768-771.
[15]	CHANG Yi, WU Ya-ju, . Risk evaluation of gas leakage in heating furnace based on Bayesian Network [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2021, 40(4): 504-509.

Development and review of building fire risk assessment methods

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments