Development and review of building fire risk assessment methods

Fire Science and Technology ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 1174-1177.

Previous Articles Next Articles

Development and review of building fire risk assessment methods

HUANG Xiao-jia1,2, WANG Yi2, XIE Shui-bo2, ZHANG Lei2

1. China IPPR International Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing 100089, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, University of South China, Hunan Hengyang 421001, China

Online:2021-08-15 Published:2021-08-15

Abstract

Abstract:

The development process of semi-quantitative analysis and quantitative analysis of building fire risk assessment since 1970s is summarized. The common analysis methods of semi quantitative evaluation, such as Delphi method, analytic hierarchy process, fuzzy evaluation, grey correlation analysis and entropy weight method were introduced briefly. Several common analysis methods in quantitative risk assessment and their application in fire risk analysis were introduced, which includes statistical analysis of fire data, event tree and fault tree, Monte Carlo simulation and Bayesian network.

Key words: building fire, risk analysis, semi-quantitative analysis, quantitative analysis

HUANG Xiao-jia, WANG Yi, XIE Shui-bo, ZHANG Lei.

Development and review of building fire risk assessment methods [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2021, 40(8): 1174-1177.

[1]	WANG Li-zhong, YU Hong-xia, YUAN Fei, DUAN Yi, SHI Jian-feng. Fire safety design of underground pedestrian corridor [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2022, 41(8): 1061-1065.
[2]	SHEN Rui, QIN Li-peng, CHEN Hai-tao. Risk analysis and countermeasure research in vehicle accident rescue [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2022, 41(6): 847-850.
[3]	PENG Yu-jie, DONG Shao-hua, XIE Shu-yi, DUAN Yu-hang. Risk analysis of tank farm based on EWM-AHP and fuzzy Bayesian network [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2022, 41(5): 634-638.
[4]	WANG Fei. Discussion on fire safety technology of new energy vehicle battery swap station [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2022, 41(5): 710-715.
[5]	. Quantitative analysis of the metallographic of Cu+Cu2O eutectic in copper wire short circuit molten beads [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2022, 41(2): 279-281.
[6]	LI Wei-dong, ZHOU De-hong, XIAO Zhen-hang, ZHANG Ming. Risk analysis of LNG storage tank based on Bow-tie normal cloud model [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2021, 40(9): 1322-1326.
[7]	DING Shi-yi, YANG Han, WANG Jian. Raman spectral identification technology of the burned globules [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2021, 40(6): 929-932.
[8]	WANG Hui-ying, WU Qi-ming, WANG Zhao-qiang. Fire cause analysis of fairs based on MCFM [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2021, 40(5): 768-771.
[9]	CHANG Yi, WU Ya-ju, . Risk evaluation of gas leakage in heating furnace based on Bayesian Network [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2021, 40(4): 504-509.
[10]	TIAN Gui-hua, WANG Xin, CHEN Ying-chun, WANG Yu-ling. Research on the causes of spontaneous combustion of SBS [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2021, 40(12): 1837-1840.
[11]	XIE Xiao-long, BI Hai-pu, LEI Wei-gang, WANG Kai-min, WANG Kai-quan, SHAO Hui. Risk analysis of aluminum dust explosion in T-branch pipeline based on MCS-CB method [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2020, 39(4): 456-460.
[12]	BA Zhen-ning, KUANG Tian, LIANG Jian-wen, LIANG Kai, WANG Ming-shuo, WANG Zhi-kai. Research progress on safety risk assessment of urban gas pipeline network operation [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2020, 39(4): 533-538.
[13]	LUO Zheng-shan, WU Chen-chen. Research on risk of gas pipeline leakage based on FTA-DBN [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2020, 39(3): 401-404.

Development and review of building fire risk assessment methods

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 13

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments