主管:中华人民共和国应急管理部
主办:应急管理部天津消防研究所
ISSN 1009-0029  CN 12-1311/TU

消防科学与技术 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 136-143.DOI: 10.20168/j.1009-0029.2026.06.0136.08

• • 上一篇    下一篇

中外室内烟火特性训练体系比较研究

谢浩1, 孙劭晨2, 王佩2, 张彩莉2   

  1. (1.国家消防救援局,北京 100097; 2.中国消防救援学院,北京 102202)
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-11 修回日期:2025-09-08 出版日期:2026-06-15 发布日期:2026-06-15
  • 作者简介:谢浩,国家消防救援局中级专业技术干部,博士,主要从事消防救援指挥与战术研究,北京市海淀区紫竹院路118号,100097。
  • 基金资助:
    国家消防救援局科技计划项目(2023XFCX34);北京市高等教育学会课题(MS2023379);中国消防救援学院院级项目(XFKYB202509)

Comparative study on international compartment fire behavior training system

Xie Hao1, Sun Shaochen2, Wang Pei2, Zhang Caili2   

  1. (1. National Fire and Rescue Administration, Beijing 100097, China; 2. China Fire and Rescue Institute, Beijing 102202, China)
  • Received:2025-06-11 Revised:2025-09-08 Online:2026-06-15 Published:2026-06-15

摘要: 室内烟火特性训练作为提升消防员实战能力的关键方法,有助于消防救援人员掌握烟火特性规律,提升火场研判与决策能力,对优化实战策略、提高救援效率与保障安全具有重要作用。通过研究美国、英国、澳大利亚及中国室内烟火特性训练体系在硬件标准、课程体系与组织实施3大核心要素上的差异化发展路径,揭示其内在逻辑。研究发现,美、英、澳体系相对呈现高模块化、强适应性、理实融合、系统韧性的特征;我国烟火特性训练起步较晚,但发展迅速,当前更为注重技能培养,急需构建标准化体系。研究结果表明,我国可探索构建“标准分层协同、动态修订,课程模块设计、系统整合,组织韧性分级、专项认证”的特色体系,以此推动硬件建设实现“国家主导、地方补充、动态迭代”,课程体系从“技能导向”向“能力模块”转型,组织实施探索专业资格认证嵌套模式和开发推广经验决策模型。

关键词: 室内烟火特性训练, 消防救援, 训练理念, 训练体系

Abstract: Compartment Fire Behavior Training (CFBT) is a key method to enhance firefighters' practical combat capabilities. It helps fire rescue person master the laws of fire and smoke characteristics, improve their ability to assess and make decisions at fire scenes, and plays a vital role in optimizing practical strategies, improving rescue efficiency, and ensuring safety. This paper reveals the internal logic by researching the differentiated development paths of CFBT systems in the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and China across three core elements: hardware standards, curriculum systems, and organizational implementation. The study finds that the CFBT systems in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia relatively exhibit characteristics of high modularity, strong adaptability, integration of theory and practice, and systemic resilience. Although CFBT in China started late, it developed rapidly. Currently, it places greater emphasis on skill training, and there is an urgent need to establish a standardized system. The research results indicate that China can explore the construction of a distinctive system featuring "stratified and coordinated standards with dynamic revision, modular curriculum design with systematic integration, and hierarchical organizational resilience with specialized certification". This system aims to promote hardware construction to achieve "national leadership, local supplementation, and dynamic iteration", transform the curriculum system from "skill-oriented" to "in-depth theory-practice modules", and in organizational implementation, explore a nested mode of professional qualification certification and promote the development and popularization of empirical models.

Key words: CFBT, fire and rescue, training philosophy, training system