主管:中华人民共和国应急管理部
主办:应急管理部天津消防研究所
ISSN 1009-0029  CN 12-1311/TU

消防科学与技术 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5): 643-649.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

基于系统思维的国内外轨道车辆防火标准体系

李旭光1,2, 于全蕾1,2, 朱国庆3, 赵震1,2   

  1. (1.中车青岛四方车辆研究所有限公司,山东 青岛 266031; 2.中铁检验认证(青岛)车辆检验站有限公司,山东 青岛 266031; 3.中国矿业大学 安全工程学院,江苏 徐州 221116)
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-14 修回日期:2025-03-06 出版日期:2025-05-15 发布日期:2025-05-15
  • 作者简介:李旭光,中车青岛四方车辆研究所有限公司研发工程师,硕士,主要从事轨道交通车辆防火安全研究,山东省青岛市市北区瑞昌路231号,266031,lxgspace@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    中国中车十四五科技重大专项(2021CKZ2018-3)

Overview of domestic and foreign rail vehicle fire protection standard systems based on systematical thinking

Li Xuguang1,2, Yu Quanlei1,2, Zhu Guoqing3, Zhao Zhen1,2   

  1. (1. CRRC Qingdao Sifang Rolling Stock Research Institute Co., Ltd., Qingdao Shandong 266031, China; 2. CRCC (Qingdao) Vehicle Inspection Station Co., Ltd., Qingdao Shandong 266031, China;3. Faculty of Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou Jiangsu 221116, China)
  • Received:2025-01-14 Revised:2025-03-06 Online:2025-05-15 Published:2025-05-15

摘要: 研究了轨道车辆的火灾危险性和国内外防火技术标准体系,给出标准及试验建议。基于系统思维和第一性原理介绍车辆火灾系统及其危险性,归纳车辆火灾试验的对象、尺度层级及对应的火灾危险类别。依据火灾尺度层级和危险类别,对比分析国内外主要车辆防火标准及其方法标准。探讨试验标准与火灾真实场景的适用性、相关性及标准建议。后续标准制修订过程中,建议将材料不燃性、燃烧热值等方法作为首选指标,将液体闪点燃点、高温氧指数、高速气体氧指数、着火性、烟气腐蚀性等方法纳入考虑范围。部件级防火重点关注实体房间火、SBI单体燃烧等试验,车用氢能、锂电系统的结构耐火应做专题研究。通过各层级试验与数值模拟耦合验证,推进真实动态场景下全尺寸车辆火灾试验方法和标准研究。

关键词: 轨道车辆, 防火标准, 火灾系统, 尺度层级, 火灾危险

Abstract: This paper studied the fire hazard of rail vehicle and the technical standard system of fire prevention at home and abroad, and offered suggestions on standards and experiments. Based on systematical thinking and the first principles, the vehicle fire system and fire hazard were introduced, and the objects, scale levels, and corresponding fire hazard categories of vehicle fire experiments were summarized. In accordance with the fire scale levels and hazard categories, the main fire protection standards and test method standards for vehicles at home and abroad were analyzed and presented. The applicability, relevance, and standard suggestions of the test standards to the real fire scenarios were explored. In the subsequent process of formulating and revising standards, it is recommended that methods such as material non-combustibility and combustion calorific value be regarded as the preferred indicators, and methods like the flash point and ignition point of liquids, high-temperature oxygen index, high-speed gas oxygen index, ignitability with a radiant heat source, and the corrosiveness of smoke be taken into consideration. For component-level fire protection, attention should be focused on tests such as full-scale room fire test and SBI test, and special researches should be conducted on the structural fire resistance of hydrogen energy and lithium battery systems for vehicles. Through the coupling verification of experiments at all levels and numerical simulation methods, the research on full-scale vehicle fire test methods and standards in real dynamic scenarios should be advanced.

Key words: rail vehicle, fire safety standard, fire system, scale classification, fire hazard